Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • AI News
    • Company Spotlights
    • AI at Word
    • Smart Tech & Tools
    • AI in Life
    • Ethics
    • Law & Policy
    • AI in Action
    • Learning AI
    • Voices & Visionaries
    • Start-ups & Capital
January 06.2026
2 Minutes Read

NO FAKES Act Resurgence: Protecting Rights in the Age of AI Deepfakes

Continue Reading Congress Reintroduces the NO FAKES Act with Broader Industry Support


Understanding the NO FAKES Act: A New Era for Content Creators

On April 14, 2025, Congress made a significant move by reintroducing the Nurture Originals, Foster Art, and Keep Entertainment Safe (NO FAKES) Act. This bipartisan bill aims to establish a federal framework to protect individuals' rights of publicity, especially in a landscape increasingly affected by generative AI and deepfakes. While previous efforts to pass the act encountered hurdles, rising concerns over the misuse of AI technologies and backing from major tech and entertainment industries have surged its momentum.

What’s New? Key Features of the Revised NO FAKES Act

The updated NO FAKES Act reflects comprehensive dialogue among stakeholders. Notable enhancements include:

  • Subpoena Power for Rights Holders: Enables rights holders to compel online services to reveal identity information of alleged infringers, thereby aiding enforcement.

  • Clarified Safe Harbors: Introduces protections for compliant online services similar to those found under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA), while also setting new eligibility criteria.

  • Digital Fingerprinting Requirement: Mandates using digital fingerprinting technologies to block unauthorized material uploads after take-down requests.

  • Broader Definition of “Online Service”: Extends liability to include search engines, e-commerce platforms, and other entities that handle digital replicas, not just creators.

  • Tiered Penalties for Non-compliance: Implements escalating fines for repeat offenders, emphasizing accountability.

  • No Duty to Monitor: Clarifies that online platforms are not obligated to monitor content preemptively, which eases operational burdens.

Why This Legislation Matters

The NO FAKES Act is crucial for creating protections for artists, public figures, and private citizens from unauthorized exploitation of their likenesses and voices via AI-generated content. Known for its bipartisan support from artists, major record labels, and even tech giants like Google and OpenAI, this bill represents a collective recognition of the pressing need to safeguard individual rights in the digital realm. This aligns with the broader conversation around ethical AI use, advocating for responsible AI frameworks that respect data privacy and promote compliance.

The Road Ahead: Bridging Balances and Principles

As the legislative process unfolds, dialogues surrounding the NO FAKES Act will center on how to achieve a balance between protecting individual rights and fostering technological innovation. Industry representatives, including artists who have rallied for this protection, argue for safeguarding human creativity against AI's transformational retailoring of media. The act aims to consolidate varying state laws, which can often complicate enforcement, into a cohesive national standard, providing greater legal clarity across jurisdictions.

A Call to Action for Stakeholders

As the future of AI technology continues to evolve, it is imperative for all stakeholders—policymakers, tech developers, artists, and consumers—to engage in discussions about the ethical implications and necessary regulations surrounding AI. The NO FAKES Act is an essential step towards creating a safer, more equitable digital environment that fosters innovation without compromising individual rights.


Ethics

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
02.18.2026

How AI Regulation Is Transforming Licensed Professions and Job Security

Update AI Regulation: A Double-Edged Sword for Professionals The landscape of regulated professions is experiencing a shift, driven by advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. With proposed regulations like the Healthy Technology Act of 2025 allowing AI systems to prescribe medications, the question arises: how will these changes impact human roles in occupations that traditionally require a license? As AI tools gain ground in their capabilities, curious expressions surround job security. For instance, the Act permits AI to fulfill functions that typically necessitate human judgment, potentially sidelining licensed healthcare professionals. While proponents argue that AI could enhance efficiency and lower costs, the looming concern of widespread job displacement cannot be overlooked. Human Oversight: An Essential Component Despite the potential benefits of AI adoption in industries such as healthcare and law, the need for human oversight remains critical. Proponents of the Healthy Technology Act emphasize rigorous FDA regulation before these AI systems can operate autonomously. However, how can we ensure that human practitioners maintain their oversight without being rendered obsolete? This dilemma is echoed in the legal profession, where AI is transforming tasks like contract drafting and compliance verification. The Tennessee Bar Association, for instance, underscores the necessity for lawyers to verify AI outputs to protect confidential information. Such adaptation signals a burgeoning need for ethical AI use: understanding capabilities, limitations, and the ethical implications of relying on algorithms. The Balance Between Innovation and Accountability As industries explore AI integration, some policymakers advocate for actively regulating AI applications while ensuring human job security. Recent proposals reflecting this perspective, like the AI-Related Job Impacts Clarity Act of 2025, aim to tackle AI-related layoffs proactively by mandating reports to the Department of Labor. This blending of innovation with accountability aims to foster an environment where technological advancements do not eclipse the need for responsible human oversight. Future Implications for Licensing Standards Looking ahead, the evolving nature of professional licensing standards must correspond with advancements in technology. The Tennessee Supreme Court’s push for regulatory reform illustrates a readiness to address how traditional frameworks can adapt to present-day demands. As AI continues to permeate various sectors, arguments around the necessity for evolution in professional licensing and the implications for regulatory bodies are essential discussions in shaping a balanced future.

02.10.2026

How AI Ethics and Regulations Defined Healthcare in 2025

Explore AI ethics in healthcare with key insights on responsible AI, regulations, and data privacy challenges shaping the industry in 2025.

01.20.2026

Navigating AI Governance: Insights from South Korea and Japan's Acts

Discover the contrasting AI governance frameworks of South Korea and Japan, focusing on ethical AI use and regulation.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*